Memorias indígenas movilizadas: un análisis del proceso de producción de los Informes Histórico-Antropológicos del relevamiento territorial de comunidades indígenas en Río Negro, Argentina;
Mobilized Indigenous Memories: An Analysis of the Production Process of Historical-Anthropological Reports of the Territorial Survey of Indigenous Communities in Río Negro, Argentina

Este artículo se propone abordar la memoria (los relatos, silencios, ocultamientos y reconexiones) como una herramienta teóricay metodológica habilitadora de nuevos marcos de interpretación que contribuyeron a disputar, expandir y moldear los límites yefectos previstos para la Ley 26.160 y el programa de relevamiento territorial de comunidades indígenas (ReTeCI) que esta leyordena, con el fin de conocer la situación territorial actual de las comunidades indígenas del país. El artículo analiza el procedimientode cumplimiento de uno de los componentes de la Carpeta Técnica (CT), focalizando en la construcción del InformeHistórico Antropológico (IHA) a fines de exponer el despliegue de múltiples efectos generados por diferentes reconexiones. Coneste análisis se busca deconstruir ciertos prejuicios regionales (y nacionales) introducidos en torno a las sospechas de inautenticidade instrumentalismo que recaen y se proyectan sobre los pueblos indígenas y sus comunidades en la actualidad; prejuiciosque consideran encontrar nuevo sustento en el estallido de autoadscripciones ocurridas en el marco del relevamiento.

In the past few years the national state has deployed different actions to recognize the rights, peculiarities and claims of the originalpeoples, elaborating different public policies, programs and projects. Notable among them for its national scope is the sanction of Law26.160, and its program for the territorial survey of indigenous communities (ReTeCI) that intends to understand the current territorialsituation of indigenous communities in the country. Focusing on the context of the execution of the survey in the province of RioNegro, this article aims to address memory (stories, silences, concealments and reconnections) as a theoretical and methodological toolto enable new frameworks of interpretation that contributed to disputing, expanding and shaping the limits and foreseen effects of thispublic policy. From this perspective, the article analyzes the procedure of compliance with one of the components of the Technical Folder(TC), focusing on the construction of the Anthropological Historical Report (IHA) in order to expose the deployment of multipleeffects generated by different reconnections. The prior is in order to deconstruct certain regional (and national) prejudices introducedaround the suspicions of inauthenticity and instrumentalism that fall and are projected on indigenous peoples and their communitiestoday; prejudices that consider finding new sustenance in the explosion of auto identification occurring in the framework of the survey.