MEGADESLIZAMIENTOS GRAVITACIONALES DE LA FORMACIÓN GUANDACOL EN CERRO BOLA Y SIERRA DE MAZ Y SU RELACIÓN CON LA GLACIACIÓN DEL PALEOZOICO TARDÍO, LA RIOJA, ARGENTINA;
MEGA GRAVITATIONAL SLIDES IN CERRO BOLA AND SIERRA DE MAZ HILLS (GUANDACOL FORMATION), AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE LATE PALEOZOIC ICE AGE, LA RIOJA, ARGENTINA

La Formación Guandacol es conocida por los extensos depósitos de la glaciación gondwánica y en los cuales se registran diferentes ciclos glaciales del Paleozoico Tardío. Sin embargo, en las áreas del Cerro Guandacol y Cerro Bola (Provincia de La Rioja, Argentina), esta formación adquiere mayor relevancia debido a la presencia y excelente exposición de depósitos de transporte en masa que debido a sus características y dimensiones, son ejemplos a escala sísmica como pocos se conocen en el mundo. Estos grandes deslizamientos submarinos parecen estar conectados con la ocurrencia de ciclos glaciales y deglaciales, donde la gran cantidad de sedimento liberado favoreció el desarrollo de estos megadepósitos. En este trabajo se documentan tres ciclos glaciales de edad mississippiana/pennsylvaniana, donde los depósitos que predominan son diamictitas glacigénicas resedimentadas. Estos depósitos se encuentran intercalados con sedimentos deltaicos o fluvio-deltaicos y marinos postglaciales. Dentro de este contexto, en este trabajo se reporta uno de los ejemplos más completo de una sucesión vertical y variaciones laterales, de depósitos de transporte en masa (a los que llamaremos en el texto por su sigla abreviada en inglés, MTD) incluyendo desde la cicatriz de deslizamiento hasta el desarrollo de estos depósitos, con todos sus elementos sedimentarios y deformacionales característicos. Se describen tres intervalos de MTDs: el MTD1 aflora en los cerros Bola y Guandacol, donde en ésta última área algunos autores sugieren una discontinuidad separando la sección basal en una nueva formación. El MTD2, que alcanza los 200 m de espesor, presenta una exposición continua de 10 km en el Cerro Bola y 4 km en el Cerro Guandacol. El MTD3 es más complejo ya que presenta fallas sinsedimentarias que permiten el desarrollo y preservación de conglomerados de “post-rilling” a lo largo de la superficie de la cicatriz de deslizamiento. Los tres MTDs son  correlacionables entre ambos cerros, donde también se muestra cómo cambian facialmente desde un margen hacia el centro de cuenca. Estas sucesiones son ejemplos únicos, ya que una serie de deslizamientos de éste porte y nivel de exposición, sólo es comparable a lo observado en registros de sísmica de reflexión a la fecha.

This paper reports and analyzes the presence of large, seismic-scale, mass transport deposits (MTD) recorded within the Guandacol Formation. These major submarine landslides seem to be connected with the occurrence of glacial episodes. The Guandacol Formation is part of the Paganzo Basin fill of Norwest Argentina, and it is well known for recording several glacial cycles of the Late Paleozoic Ice Age. In this contribution we report and describe three major glacial/deglacial cycles (Fig. 1b) of Mississippian/Pennsylvanian age (Valdez et al., 2013). Outcrops of Guandacol Formation in Cerro Bola and Sierra de Maz (Cerro Guandacol) areas preserve those glacial cycles and each consists in the succession from non-glacial deltaic deposits to proglacial and thick mass-transport deposits (resedimented diamictites), which are the aim of this study, and finally postglacial marine varied strata, including sandy turbidites, shales with and without dropstones and some deltaic deposits (Milana et al., 2010; Dykstra et al., 2011). This study focuses on Sierra de Maz and Cerro Bola localities because they show very well exposed these seismic-scale MTDs that otherwise would be quite difficult to see (Fig. 2a, b). Thus, these outcrops give the opportunity to compare many characteristics that usually are seen in seismic records, directly on the ground. On this sense, this contribution is mainly oriented to describe the facial and geometrical interrelations between these large MTDs (as there are many minor MTDs) and not the detailed internal architecture or their comparison to specific seismic features. The occurrence of these large MTDs can be explained by the large amounts of sediment delivered to the basin triggered by glacial- deglacial episodes. Due to the scarcity of well-exposed mega-scale MTD successions, a detailed study is being carried out since a few years. The result of detailed mapping of this rough terrain allow an excellent correlation between single MTDs, for several kilometers from Guandacol to Bola Hill outcrops (Fig. 3), and also portraying how singular MTD change laterally when passing from a basin-margin environment (Guandacol Hill) to a basin-center environment (Bola Hill). The local Guandacol Formation shows three large glacial cycles that are mainly represented by single large MTDs and/or MTD composite intervals. The oldest MTD1 crops out completely in the Guandacol Hill, but only the upper part is present at Bola Hill (Fig. 4). MTD1 particular diagenesis and broad folds caused some authors to separate it from Guandacol Formation but we did not find any significant unconformity other than the normal upper relief between it and the following inter-MTD deposits. MTD2 is the largest and occurs as basin widens and more accommodation space is available. Reaching up to 200 m thick, it crops out continuously for more than 10 km in Bola Hill and 4 km in Guandacol Hill (Figs. 5, 6). The MTD3 is more complex due to its encroaching with large syn-sedimentary faults that we interpret as a large-scale slide scar associated to the MTD3 interval (Figs. 9, 10). This potential slide scar is associated with other elements as incised valleys or rilling at the scar surface, which have been observed in subsurface examples. Therefore one of the largest example of MTD successions and probably the best exposed worldwide is documented for the first time as a large, seismic-scale slide-scar cropping out in association to an MTD interval, with all the suite of sedimentary and deformational elements that might be expected for this play. Due to the fact these features are rarely exposed altogether, we expect this outcrop could be a world-class example to observe features cropping out that otherwise could be only studied indirectly from deep-water seismic surveys. This succession also serves as an example of how some sedimentary features could be easily mistaken by tectonic features when the scale of the sedimentary processes involves the discrete movement of large volumes (several km3) of semiconsolidated sedimentary units, as in the case presented here.