Estrés psicosocial y baja resiliencia, un factor de riesgo de hipertensión arterial;
Psychosocial Stress and Low Resilience: a Risk Factor for Hypertension

RESUMENIntroducciónEl estrés psicosocial crónico (EPC) fue propuesto como un factor de riesgo cardiovascular (FRC); sin embargo, la complejidad y la falta de medidas objetivas para evaluarlo, unidas al hecho de que no todas las personas reaccionan ante él de igual manera, determinaron que en la actualidad no se cuente con estudios concluyentes al respecto.ObjetivosDeterminar si la baja resiliencia (BR) frente al EPC se asocia con hipertensión arterial y daño de órgano blanco en pacientes ambulatorios libres de tratamiento que concurren a realizarse un examen periódico de salud y comprobar si esta asociación tiene relación con el patrón de activación neurohormonal.Material y métodosSe realizó un estudio preliminar, observacional transversal, en el que se enrolaron en forma consecutiva 53 individuos, 32 varones y 21 mujeres. Los pacientes completaron dos cuestionarios: uno para medir EPC y el otro, la Escala de Resiliencia de Connor-Davidson. Quedaron divididos en cuatro grupos: 1, sin EPC y con resiliencia normal (RN); 2, sin EPC y con baja resiliencia (BR); 3, con EPC y RN; 4, con EPC y BR.

 SUMMARYBackgroundChronic psychosocial stress (CPSS) has been proposed as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD); yet there are not conclusive studies supporting this theory due to the complexity and the lack of objective assessment measures, together with the absence of homogeneous reactions towards CPSS.ObjectivesTo determine the presence of an association between low resilience (LR) to chronic PSS and hypertension and target organ damage in untreated outpatients undergoing a routine health examination, and to determine whether this association is related to the pattern of neurohumoral activation.Material and MethodsWe conducted a preliminary observational and cross-sectional study that enrolled 53 consecutive patients, 32 men and 21 women. The patients answered two questionnaires: one measured CPSS and the other the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Patients were divided into four groups: 1, no CPSS and normal resilience (NR); 2, no CPPS and low resilience (LR) 3, with CPSS and NR; 4 with CPSS and LR.ResultsThe prevalence of hypertension and increased waist circumference (IWC) was greater in group 4 (p<0.001 and p=0.05, respectively). The plasma levels of norepinephrine, cortisol and vanillyl mandelic acid were slightly increased in group 4, yet these differences were not significant. A logistic regression model was used to control for confounding in order to determine whether CPPS together with LR constitute a risk factor for the development of hypertension; odds ratio, 10.9, 95% CI: 1.7-65.2.ConclusionsThese preliminary data suggest that subjects with CPPS and LR have high risk for the development of hypertension