LACAN Y LA PRESENCIA DEL ANALISTA EN SU PRIMER SEMINARIO;
LACAN AND THE ANALYST´S PRESENCE IN HIS FIRST SEMINAR

Lacan hace un anticipo valioso en su seminario Los Escritos Técnicos de Freud, de su concepto de presencia del analista. Propongo que actuando junto al de transferencia freudiana, amplía la misma al registro de lo real. Lo extrae de su experiencia como sentimiento del misterio de la presencia que aparece en el sujeto, cuando ante un imposible del avance de su palabra, se conecta al analista como presencia. En el caso Robert aparece del lado del analista en la "permanencia" de su presencia, de la que habla Rosine Lefort ante un niño que había vivido múltiples mudanzas y encuentros traumáticos en muchas de ellas. En Dick, caso de Melanie Klein, este niño pasa en análisis de no registrar al otro y su presencia, a sentir angustia ante la ausencia y reclamar la presencia humana.

In his First Seminar, Freud´s Technical Writings, Lacan makes a valuable approach of his concept of the analyst´s presence. I propose that, acting together with the Freudian transference, he extends it to the register of the real. He extracts it from his own experience as a feeling of the mystery of the presence that appears in the subject, when faced with an impossibility of the advance of his word, he connects to the analyst as presence. In the case Robert, it appears on the analyst´s side in the “permanence” of his presence, of which Rosine Lefort speaks, facing with a child who had experienced several moves and traumatic encounters in many of them. In Dick, the case of Melanie Klein, this child goes in analysis from not registering the other and their presence, to feeling anguish at the absence and claiming the human presence.