
RASAL © - Revista de la Sociedad Argentina de Estudios Lingüísticos - 2021: 49-70
FERNANDA WIEFLING
69
Gnutzmann, C. & H. Oldenburg. 1991. “Contrastive Text Linguistics in LSP-Research: Theoretical
Considerations and some Preliminary Findings”, en: Schröder, H. (ed.) Subject-oriented Texts:
Language for Special Purposes and Text Theory, 101-136. New York/Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Ghio, E. & M. D. Fernández. 2008. Lingüística Sistémico-Funcional. Aplicaciones a la Lengua
Española. Santa Fe: Universidad Nacional del Litoral.
Guber, R. 2001. La etnografía, método, campo y reexividad. Bogotá: Grupo Editorial Norma.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1978. El lenguaje como semiótica social. México: FCE.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K. 2004. The Language of Science, vol. 5, en: Webster, J. J. (ed.) The collected Works of
M.A.K. Halliday. London: Continuum.
Halliday, M.A.K. & R. Hasan. 1985. Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-
semiotic perspective. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
Halliday, M.A.K., McIntosh, A. & P. D. Strevens. 1964. The linguistic sciences and language teaching.
Londres: Longman.
Hasan, R. 1978. “Text in the Systemic-Functional Model”, en: Dressler, W. (ed.) Current Trends in
Textlinguistics, 228-146. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Hasan, R. 1989. “The structure of a text; the texture of a text; the identity of a text”, en: Halliday,
M.A.K. & R. Hasan (eds.) Language, context and text: aspects of language in a social-semiotic
perspective, 55-118. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hasan, R. 1996. “The nursery tale as genre”, en: Cloran, C., Butt, D. & G. Williams (eds.) Ways of Saying:
Ways of Meaning. Selected Papers of Ruqaiya Hasan, 51-72. London & New York: Cassell.
Hlavacka, L. 2005. “Propuesta de modelización de la estructura genérica del abstract del artículo de
investigación en inglés con propósitos aplicados”, en: Signo y Seña 14. 233-255.
Holmes, R. 1997. “Genre Analysis, and the Social Sciences: An investigation of the Structure of
Research Article Discussion Sections in Three Disciplines”, en: English for Specic Purposes,
16(4). 321-337.
Hood, S. 2010. Appraising Research. Evaluation in Academic Writing. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Korner, H., McInnes D. & D. Rose. 2007. Science literacy. Sydney: NSW AMES.
Malinowski, B. 1923. “The problem of meaning in primitive languages”, en: Ogden C. K. & I. A.
Richards (eds.) The Meaning of Meaning, 296-336. New York: Harcourt Brace & World.
Malinowski, B. 1935. Coral Gradens and their Magic, Vol. 2. London: Allen & Unwin. Marcus, G.
1980. “Rethoric and the Ethnographic Genre in Anthropological Research”, en: Current
Anthropology 21. 507-10.
Marcus, G. & D. Cushman. 1982. “Ethnographies as Texts”, en: Annual Review of Anthropology
11. 25-69.
Martin, J. R. 1985. “Process and text: two aspects of human semiosis.” en: Benson, J. D. & W. S.
Greaves (eds.) Systemic perspectives on discourse: Selected theoretical papers from the 9th
International Systemic Workshop, vol. I, 248-274. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Martin, J. R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Martin, J. R. 2001. “A context for genre: modelling social processes in functional linguistics”, en:
Devilliers, J & R. Stainton (eds.) Communication in Linguistics: papers in honor of Michael
Gregory, Theoria Series 10, 287-328. Toronto: GREF.